Bookmark this article because there is heaps of intelligence about 360 degree review initiatives encompassed within.

It is important that 360 degree feedbackis carried out sensitively and fairly and that the individual should remain in control of the process as far as possible. There should be adequate planning beforehand and support afterwards for the participants. Those giving feedback should be encouraged to do so in an objective and positive way. The 360-degree performance appraisal policy is very complicated and difficult to implement. One may ask why organizations should invest in 360 degree performance appraisal system? Here the answer is for the long-term development of employees and to create a strong leadership front. For a 360 feedback process to work, it must be connected with the overall strategic aims of your organization. If you have identified competencies or have comprehensive job descriptions, give people feedback on their performance of the expected competencies and job duties. The system will fail if it is an add-on rather than a supporter of your organization’s fundamental direction and requirements. It must function as a measure of the accomplishment of your organization’s big and long-term picture. 360-degree feedback is so named because it solicits feedback regarding an employee's behavior from a variety of points of view (subordinate, lateral, and supervisory). It therefore may be contrasted with "downward feedback" (traditional feedback on work behavior and performance delivered to subordinates by supervisory or management employees only; see traditional performance appraisal), or "upward feedback" delivered to supervisory or management employees by subordinates only. Most 360 degree assessments include open-ended questions to collect qualitative feedback, as well. A typical 360 degree assessment will take between 8-15 minutes to complete depending on length. There is still a place for performance reviews in the workplace. Where 360 degree feedbackis a tool for development, performance appraisals are tools for reward, and they can sit alongside each other quite comfortably.

With any feedback process, the "So what?" question can be addressed by interpretive material, presented either one-on-one or in a printed development guide. Most of the instruments in use today do come with development planning materials of some sort. This may be in the form of a detailed interpretive and planning guide. Do not rush to develop competencies that received low scores immediately after the end of the 360 degree review. Consider discussing the results with the manager or coach/mentor beforehand. It may turn out that it will be more efficient to develop exactly those competencies that have received high scores since the level of other competencies is at a sufficient level. Organizational support systems have to be in place if change is to be obtained and sustained from 360 degree programs. Clear expectations need to be set about what the organization seeks and why, as a context for development planning. Further, supervisors and others in the organization associated with an employee's development have important roles to play as coaches and supporters to provide follow-up support. 360-degree feedback system is not the end product; once you start the process it is important to see the consequences of the process. Specific goals and opportunities are outlined in the development program; it does make sense to check the progress. The re-evaluation of the participant will enable the organization to see the changes and the area in which the employees are actually improved. Looking into 360 degree feedback can be a time consuming process.

Implementing A 360 Feedback Program

Research has shown that many organizations that use 360-degree feedback programs for managerial and leadership assessment fail to put these programs into a strategic context. Without a clear link to what drives competitive advantage, an organization will not be making the most of what a well-designed 360-degree feedback process with customer involvement has to offer. The realization that 360-degree feedback can be a tool to manage connectivity is very much in line with the changing nature of the workplace and the relationships employees have with their employers. This includes taking greater responsibility for self-management and participating more in the leadership processes of the organization in how work gets done. This kind of employee empowerment is enabled by 360-degree feedback processes. Not only can 360 reviews be harder to coordinate, they can also be difficult and unwieldy to manage. Without the right software, keeping track of, organizing, and delivering feedback can be frustrating, tedious, and time-consuming. By integrating multi-rater assessments like 360-degree feedback into their talent management plan, organizations can identify what’s most important for their strategic goals. The correct implementation of multi-rater assessments helps improve an organization’s financial performance, strengthen its existing talent, and enhance its leadership pipeline for the future. More often these days, 360 degree feedbacksurveys are based on value models, although they are naturally based on behavioural translations of these values. There are generic leadership models available for use by a range of different organisations which can provide a well-tested framework and often a large database of useful comparative norm data. Researching what is 360 degree feedback is known to the best first step in determining your requirements and brushing up on your understanding in this area.

An individual’s 360 degree data is really representing the current quality of their relationships more than anything else. This is where you need to encourage everyone to take the broad view of the data rather than overinterpreting low ratings. For this reason it is important to always look at the patterns more than the numbers themselves and your job is to encourage others to do the same. Anonymity in 360 degree feedbackpresents some problems. For example, if the 360-degree process is indeed completely anonymous, employees might be more inclined to leave unhelpful comments or target coworkers they have issues with. Overall the 360 degree feedbackprocess improves the reliability and validity of performance information, which is invaluable data for both organisations and the individuals involved. If all of the above are taken into full consideration any user will benefit from the process. 360-degree feedback enhances information quality by providing specific performance feedback, which targets development areas, enhances self-knowledge and provides strong motivation for performance improvement. The benefits of 360-degree feedback are that it strengthens company culture and builds trust in an organization and helps leaders use recognition to shift company culture. It also provides nuanced perspectives to help conquer bias in the workplace and fosters teamwork across departments. The power in 360 feedback is not just in allowing people to express their opinions, it is also in facilitating a listening beyond the norm. Most of us in HR know that listening is key and always good. You may also know that your managers are not that great at it. Nonetheless, a keen understanding of 360 degree feedback system can be seen to be a multifaceted challenge in any workplace.

360 Degree Feedback Data Is Easy To Misinterpret

To create or maintain trust, the 360 degree process should be perceived by managers as supportive and by raters as not revealing their individual responses, particularly in feedback reports. In large part, ensuring rater anonymity is a matter of distributing the forms to an adequate number of raters in each rating group and ascertaining (from the vendor) that feedback from a rater group will not be provided unless a minimum number of forms (usually three) are scorable for a group (for example, direct reports, peers). Once assured of this safety net, most raters will be comfortable completing forms and will provide honest and helpful responses. Ensure there will be no breaches of confidentiality in the 360 degree process, and that all the reviewers understand this. It’s difficult to provide critical feedback to a colleague, especially when you have to attach your name to it. So provide reviewers with the ability to give anonymous feedback, otherwise they might feel inclined to temper their responses rather than create disharmony in a team environment. In this age of automation, online 360 degree feedbacktools are mostly deployed that have to be customized to the needs of the process they are being used in. Of course, the core piece of the process is a feedback form that has to be built with well-researched questions structured logically equipped to gather effective feedback for the recipient. Sometimes the 360 degree questions are unduly complex or unclear or the competency framework has some overlaps and lack of granularity within it which can lead to average ratings giving misleading information. At an individual level though the key thing that can occur to bring someone’s ratings down is a critical incident and/or an integrity issue. Stakeholders invest a great deal of time providing input into a 360-degree review. There is a risk that they will feel frustrated if they provide input, but don’t see action being taken. Organisations should avoid fear based responses when coming to terms with 360 appraisal in the workplace.

Some items in use on 360 degree instruments available today relate more to stable traits than to skills or behaviors (for example, "high level of aspiration," "unhurried," "dependable"). Yet, many items are behavioral in nature, focusing on specific ways of behaving or on leadership practices. For example, items such as "I praise people for a job well done" or "plans what resources are needed to carry out a task or project" would be more behavioral in their approach. Some items are more accurately described as skill- or competency-based, such as "speaks effectively to a large group" or "is good at visualizing ways to improve." The promise of 360 degree feedbackbecomes visible from extraordinary process results: improved employee satisfaction with the work environment, significant behavior changes aligned with organization values and objectives, and better individual and team performance that goes beyond employees to external customers, who buy goods and services. A 360 survey generally includes a list of statements or questions that are organized into competency categories. The scores are averaged out in each category, which is then presented to the employee. Define who will be involved in the 360 review process. This includes which employees will be reviewed and by whom (e.g., who has direct insight into whom), those who will be responsible for sending out surveys (usually senior managers or HR department personnel), and which managers will be responsible for collecting feedback and delivering it to employees. For the practitioner, 360-degree feedback is seen more as a means, not an end itself. Here, the purpose of measurement is more important, and any concern with measurement lies more with its usefulness to have impact. Utility becomes the driving question, in addition to issues of validity and reliability. The practitioner also recognizes that variation among ratings comes from the different rater perspectives, which, after all, represent multiple realities. People need to feel in control of their destiny - that is why a clear understanding of 360 feedback software is important to any forward thinking organisation.

Open-text Feedback

You can be sure to maximise the visionary dimension by truly listening to the future strategy and the visionaries of the organisation, seeking out trends in the market-place – in your industry and in HR in general and by looking internationally, eg using the thought that the US trends may take a while to get to the UK. Be wary of past “myths” that may not now hold true. You can get swallowed into accepted thinking and practice if you are not careful. You can tell if your decisions and judgments are aligned with your unconscious or not – they feel fine and clear and good, or they tend to feel awkward and wrong if they are not. It is hard to truly discern our unconscious biases as they are so hidden. Others may know more about them than you do yourself. For organizations that are trying to create more collective learning norms, 360-degree feedback should not be overlooked as one avenue for encouraging and supporting those norms. Although we are not aware of any organization where 360-degree feedback is handled in a completely shared fashion, we have seen evidence of organizations taking steps in this direction. Get supplementary intel regarding 360 degree review initiatives in this Wikipedia page.

Related Articles:

More Insight On 360-Degree feedback objectives

Further Information With Regard To 360 evaluation objectives

Extra Insight With Regard To 360 assessment objectives

More Background Findings On 360-Degree feedback applications

Background Information With Regard To 360 degree feedback processes

Additional Insight On 360 degree review processes

Additional Insight On 360 appraisal projects